Skip to content

fix(itg): restore failed incremental hashes for BUG-029 - #303

Draft
sbalabanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sbalabanov/bug-029
Draft

fix(itg): restore failed incremental hashes for BUG-029#303
sbalabanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sbalabanov/bug-029

Conversation

@sbalabanov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Intent:

  • BUG-029 requires failed incremental hash traversals to leave retryable graph state.

Changes:

  • Track active recursion separately from persisted hashes and stage results until traversal succeeds.
  • Cover a failed dependency hash, cache-format round trip, and successful retry on the same graph.

Generated by the 🪄 pr-create skill in devexp-agent-marketplace

Test Plan

AI Verification

Validated at 976b5e3 on Aug 26 18:25 UTC · 2 files analyzed · 1s

Validator Status Issues
go-lint not_applicable 0
go-coverage not_applicable 0
ios-lint not_applicable 0
uber-one not_applicable 0
go-thrift-lint not_applicable 0
android-lint not_applicable 0
java-lint not_applicable 0
java-coverage not_applicable 0
go-proto-lint not_applicable 0
android-coverage not_applicable 0
ios-test not_applicable 0
web not_applicable 0
diff-template not_applicable 0
ureview completed 0
custom not_applicable 0

0 issues detected

Skipped validators: claude · EngWiki

Issues

T3-BUG-029

Summary:
Intent:
- BUG-029 requires failed incremental hash traversals to leave retryable graph state.

Changes:
- Track active recursion separately from persisted hashes and stage results until traversal succeeds.
- Cover a failed dependency hash, cache-format round trip, and successful retry on the same graph.

---

<sub>Generated by the 🪄 [pr-create](https://sg.uberinternal.com/code.uber.internal/uber-code/devexp-agent-marketplace/-/blob/claude-code/plugins/dev/uber-dev/skills/pr-create/SKILL.md) skill in devexp-agent-marketplace</sub>
@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@sbalabanov
sbalabanov marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2026 18:32
@sbalabanov
sbalabanov requested review from a team as code owners August 26, 2026 18:32
@sbalabanov
sbalabanov marked this pull request as draft August 26, 2026 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants