Skip to content

Use base-compat on Kraft for procfs support - #1243

Merged
jviotti merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
compat-base-kraft
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

Use base-compat on Kraft for procfs support#1243
jviotti merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
compat-base-kraft

Conversation

@jviotti

@jviotti jviotti commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti jv@jviotti.com

Review in cubic

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti <jv@jviotti.com>

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Re-trigger cubic

@augmentcode

augmentcode Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the public Enterprise E2E deployment Kraftfile to use Unikraft's base-compat:latest runtime.
Why: The compatibility runtime supplies procfs support required by the deployed service while retaining the existing image, command, and scaling configuration.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@jviotti
jviotti merged commit 8d96057 into main Aug 25, 2026
6 checks passed
@jviotti
jviotti deleted the compat-base-kraft branch August 25, 2026 16:16

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Index (community)

Details
Benchmark suite Current: d0c408d Previous: 812139c Ratio
Add one schema (0 existing) 307 ms 338 ms 0.91
Add one schema (100 existing) 37 ms 42 ms 0.88
Add one schema (1000 existing) 97 ms 97 ms 1
Add one schema (10000 existing) 776 ms 1043 ms 0.74
Update one schema (1 existing) 28 ms 28 ms 1
Update one schema (101 existing) 38 ms 38 ms 1
Update one schema (1001 existing) 99 ms 97 ms 1.02
Update one schema (10001 existing) 1087 ms 951 ms 1.14
Cached rebuild (1 existing) 10 ms 11 ms 0.91
Cached rebuild (101 existing) 13 ms 12 ms 1.08
Cached rebuild (1001 existing) 46 ms 39 ms 1.18
Cached rebuild (10001 existing) 347 ms 350 ms 0.99
Index 100 schemas 588 ms 647 ms 0.91
Index 1000 schemas 1416 ms 1457 ms 0.97
Index 10000 schemas 12729 ms 13081 ms 0.97
Index 10000 schemas (custom meta-schema) 14970 ms 15672 ms 0.96
Index 10000 schemas ($ref fan-out) 15049 ms 15648 ms 0.96

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Index (enterprise)

Details
Benchmark suite Current: d0c408d Previous: 812139c Ratio
Add one schema (0 existing) 376 ms 487 ms 0.77
Add one schema (100 existing) 127 ms 111 ms 1.14
Add one schema (1000 existing) 179 ms 150 ms 1.19
Add one schema (10000 existing) 821 ms 815 ms 1.01
Update one schema (1 existing) 113 ms 89 ms 1.27
Update one schema (101 existing) 122 ms 284 ms 0.43
Update one schema (1001 existing) 180 ms 147 ms 1.22
Update one schema (10001 existing) 840 ms 794 ms 1.06
Cached rebuild (1 existing) 12 ms 63 ms 0.19
Cached rebuild (101 existing) 16 ms 13 ms 1.23
Cached rebuild (1001 existing) 45 ms 40 ms 1.13
Cached rebuild (10001 existing) 352 ms 285 ms 1.24
Index 100 schemas 483 ms 572 ms 0.84
Index 1000 schemas 1547 ms 1355 ms 1.14
Index 10000 schemas 12992 ms 12683 ms 1.02
Index 10000 schemas (custom meta-schema) 15297 ms 14501 ms 1.05
Index 10000 schemas ($ref fan-out) 15353 ms 14217 ms 1.08

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant