Prepare v0.3.3 release - #145
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps to 0.3.3 and records the release in the version history.
Cargo.lockis regenerated in the same commit because the release workflow runscargo publish --locked.0.3.2 is already tagged and published to crates.io, so this is the next version — tags are never reused.
What's in 0.3.3
All four PRs address the same underlying theme: stack metadata is a cache of git, and treating it as the source of truth produces confident wrong answers.
ez statusderivedneeds_restackby comparing the parent tip to the cachedparent_head, so a branch rebased outside ez reported that it needed a restack when it was already sitting on its parent. Now asks git, via a sharedrestack::branch_needs_restackthatez checkoutalso uses — the two commands previously disagreed about the same branch.ez merge's post-merge restack was its own loop predating the shared engine from 0.2.29. A stack entry whose branch was gone aborted the whole command after the PR had merged, so a successful merge exited 1. It now runs throughrestack_branches_with_options, gaining missing-branch skips, theeffective_old_basefallback, per-branch isolation, and the worktree guard.?. A restack failure therefore skipped cleanup once the stack entry was already deleted, leaving a branch and worktree no command could see. Cleanup now runs first, andez syncgained a safety net that collects orphans under this repo's.worktrees/.headRefOidmatches the local tip, so a recycled branch name or a fork contributor's same-named PR can't authorize a deletion.Backfill
The version history table stopped at 0.2.29; 0.3.0, 0.3.1, and 0.3.2 were never written down. Added from their tag ranges.
Full suite and clippy green.