Skip to content

chore(audit): remove reconciled legacy audit-run MD trees (2 runs)#250

Merged
thedavidmeister merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-legacy-audit-runs
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

chore(audit): remove reconciled legacy audit-run MD trees (2 runs)#250
thedavidmeister merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-legacy-audit-runs

Conversation

@thedavidmeister

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Delete the internal audit-run working directories 2026-03-10-01 (full run) and 2026-03-23-01 (30 MD files). The external Protofire audit PDF is retained.

Why — nothing is lost

Checked both triages against the issue tracker and live source:

Notable caveat (reinforces deletion)

These runs contain a false-clear of the #239 class: pass5 marks mul() "CORRECT (overflow reverts)" for the exact checked add that in fact still Panics(0x11) on negative-exponent squaring (confirmed live on main by an adversarial-mutation pass). #239 is tracked independently (issue #239 + PR #244), so removing these working copies loses nothing — and drops a misleading "verified correct" note rather than preserving it.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed multiple historical audit reports and triage documents.
    • No user-facing product, functionality, or API changes are included.

Delete the internal audit-run working directories 2026-03-10-01 (full run) and
2026-03-23-01. Every actionable finding is accounted for: the sole MEDIUM
(A08-7 toDecimalString revert class) is FIXED and corroborated by closed issues
#181/#182/#184/#185; all LOW findings are FIXED / WONTFIX / DOCUMENTED; the five
items left PENDING in the 03-10 run are all resolved in 03-23. No CRITICAL/HIGH
findings, and no unfiled actionable finding — nothing is lost.

Note: these runs also contain a false-clear of the #239 class (pass5 marks
mul() "CORRECT (overflow reverts)" for the exact checked add that in fact still
Panics(0x11) on negative-exponent squaring). #239 is tracked independently
(issue #239 + PR #244), so removing the working copies loses nothing — and drops
a misleading "verified correct" note.

The external Protofire audit PDF is retained.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister self-assigned this Jul 14, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9512f422-bb69-4555-8330-0e4b4b94ae0d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 774ed07 and d3b1d61.

📒 Files selected for processing (30)
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass0/process.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloatDeploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibFormatDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibLogTable.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibParseDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LogTablesPointers.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/errors.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/scripts.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibFormatDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/errors_gen_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/parse_and_tables.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/impl_format_parse.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/misc.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/concrete_errors_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/impl_format_parse_table.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/concrete_errors_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/format_parse_table.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/triage.md
  • audit/2026-03-23-01/triage.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (30)
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass0/process.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/misc.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibFormatDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LogTablesPointers.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/concrete_errors_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-23-01/triage.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/impl_format_parse.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/impl_format_parse_table.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/parse_and_tables.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibFormatDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/DecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibLogTable.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloatDeploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/format_parse_table.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/concrete_errors_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/scripts.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibDecimalFloatImplementation.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/errors.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/errors_gen_deploy.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/LibDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/LibParseDecimalFloat.md
  • audit/2026-03-10-01/triage.md

Walkthrough

The change removes or leaves absent audit-pass and triage Markdown reports under audit/2026-03-10-01 and audit/2026-03-23-01. No Solidity code, public declarations, logic, or API behavior changes are shown.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Pass 0 audit report
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass0/process.md
Removes the existing process report content.
Pass 1 audit reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass1/*
Removes or provides no replacement for the Pass 1 audit reports.
Pass 2 audit reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass2/*
Removes the Pass 2 coverage and findings reports.
Pass 3 audit reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass3/*
Removes or provides no replacement for the Pass 3 reports.
Pass 4 audit reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass4/*
Removes the Pass 4 reports.
Pass 5 audit reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/pass5/*
Removes or provides no replacement for the Pass 5 reports.
Triage reports
audit/2026-03-10-01/triage.md, audit/2026-03-23-01/triage.md
Removes the recorded triage tables and statuses.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the PR’s main change: removing two reconciled legacy audit-run Markdown directory trees.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/remove-legacy-audit-runs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@thedavidmeister

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reviewed d3b1d61: ready — deletes only audit/*.md (2 legacy audit-run dirs, 30 files; PDF retained), zero non-audit files touched. The three red checks (rainix-sol/static, rs-static, rainix-sol/test) are all PRE-EXISTING main conditions — the no-vm.skip static gate + the deploy-pin/test red — which a markdown deletion cannot affect (main independently reds on rainix-sol/test). Admin-merging per approval.

@thedavidmeister
thedavidmeister merged commit f84420d into main Jul 14, 2026
6 of 9 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai assess this PR size classification for the totality of the PR with the following criterias and report it in your comment:

S/M/L PR Classification Guidelines:

This guide helps classify merged pull requests by effort and complexity rather than just line count. The goal is to assess the difficulty and scope of changes after they have been completed.

Small (S)

Characteristics:

  • Simple bug fixes, typos, or minor refactoring
  • Single-purpose changes affecting 1-2 files
  • Documentation updates
  • Configuration tweaks
  • Changes that require minimal context to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 5-10 minutes

Examples:

  • Fix typo in variable name
  • Update README with new instructions
  • Adjust configuration values
  • Simple one-line bug fixes
  • Import statement cleanup

Medium (M)

Characteristics:

  • Feature additions or enhancements
  • Refactoring that touches multiple files but maintains existing behavior
  • Breaking changes with backward compatibility
  • Changes requiring some domain knowledge to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 15-30 minutes

Examples:

  • Add new feature or component
  • Refactor common utility functions
  • Update dependencies with minor breaking changes
  • Add new component with tests
  • Performance optimizations
  • More complex bug fixes

Large (L)

Characteristics:

  • Major feature implementations
  • Breaking changes or API redesigns
  • Complex refactoring across multiple modules
  • New architectural patterns or significant design changes
  • Changes requiring deep context and multiple review rounds

Review Effort: Would have taken 45+ minutes

Examples:

  • Complete new feature with frontend/backend changes
  • Protocol upgrades or breaking changes
  • Major architectural refactoring
  • Framework or technology upgrades

Additional Factors to Consider

When deciding between sizes, also consider:

  • Test coverage impact: More comprehensive test changes lean toward larger classification
  • Risk level: Changes to critical systems bump up a size category
  • Team familiarity: Novel patterns or technologies increase complexity

Notes:

  • the assessment must be for the totality of the PR, that means comparing the base branch to the last commit of the PR
  • the assessment output must be exactly one of: S, M or L (single-line comment) in format of: SIZE={S/M/L}
  • do not include any additional text, only the size classification
  • your assessment comment must not include tips or additional sections
  • do NOT tag me or anyone else on your comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

SIZE=S

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant