fix: roadmap

[degenaro]

re: https://www.bestpractices.dev/en/projects/9408/silver/

The project MUST have a documented roadmap that describes what the project intends to do and not do for at least the next year. (URL required) [documentation_roadmap]
The project might not achieve the roadmap, and that's fine; the purpose of the roadmap is to help potential users and contributors understand the intended direction of the project. It need not be detailed.

[degenaro]

/vote

[git-vote]

Vote created

@degenaro has called for a vote on fix: roadmap (#180).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@oscal-compass/oversight-committee-members

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor	Against	Abstain
👍	👎	👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 28days. It will pass if at least 51% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

[git-vote]

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

66.67% of the users with binding vote were in favor and 0.00% were against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
4	0	0	2

Binding votes (4)

User	Vote	Timestamp
@ancatri	In favor	2026-09-08 18:41:24.0 +00:00:00
@degenaro	In favor	2026-09-04 14:27:56.0 +00:00:00
@vikas-agarwal76	In favor	2026-09-05 3:19:35.0 +00:00:00
@yuji-watanabe-jp	In favor	2026-09-08 6:01:23.0 +00:00:00

[degenaro]

ROADMAP.md is a dedicated, top-level file that explicitly describes what the OSCAL Compass project intends to do (5 named goals covering codebase maintenance, agentic authoring, community growth, OpenSSF Best Practices, and CNCF Incubation) and not do (enterprise support, certification authority functions, vulnerability scanning, and legacy format support) over the next year.

Key URL:

https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/ROADMAP.md
The document is intentionally high-level (not feature-by-feature), which is exactly what the criterion expects — enough for potential users and contributors to understand the project's direction without requiring exhaustive detail.

[vikas-agarwal76]

LGTM