fix: repair legacy workbench migration collisions

[mldangelo-oai]

Summary

• Repair legacy workbench migration collisions and incomplete historical SQLite schemas.
• Preserve the public migration compatibility fixes, stable target backfills, execution-profile histories, and continuation ownership.

Stack

• Intentionally stacked on mdangelo/codex/model-native-deep-workers so this review contains only its atomic upstream change.
• Prerequisite for the pending 0.1.6 release in release: bump Codex Security to 0.1.6 #244; package version is unchanged.

Verification

• Parsed every bundled workbench Python module.
• Verified all 105 declared plugin payload files exist.
• Initialized a fresh private workbench SQLite database successfully.
• Passed the focused Deep Scan ownership/continuation regression suite.
• Passed the focused released-migration and bundled artifact-schema regression tests.
• The complete reconstructed sync passed 775 tests (5 platform/integration skips) and the installed-package smoke test.

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

Please review the exact current head 6cacd6f8079fb1e5cde8e215aeedc41f73d1f953 and only this atomic PR's declared base-to-head diff.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 6cacd6f807

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6cacd6f807

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

Please review the exact updated head 16bb5a9e2c91567ba634c08bdcdfbc2484d71ca6. This additive update ships the exact generated MCP runtime from the same original upstream commit and preserves the atomic base-to-head diff.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: 16bb5a9e2c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 16bb5a9e2c

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

Please review the exact updated head c06d7584ace9917f70febf3ea182d810917dd658. Inherits the regression-tested prompt/headless rejoin fix and safe URL delegation; the generated MCP runtime matches this original upstream stage and retains the bounded headless user-context argument.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c06d7584ac

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c06d7584ac

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

Please review the exact updated head 3839336f09624f9bc77785d57a5391e26e5f624e. Inherits regression-tested resumable finalization, accurate cached-token totals, distinct canonical finding identities, complete ignored-file coverage, safe context delegation, and preserved prompt/headless scan identity; the generated runtime remains matched to this original atomic upstream stage.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3839336f09

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3839336f09

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

Please review the exact updated head 73f5c5c0ea44c8a590b95430db63dff8087c23f0. Inherits regression-tested resumable finalization, accurate cached-token totals, distinct canonical finding identities, complete ignored-file coverage, safe context delegation, and preserved prompt/headless scan identity; the generated runtime remains matched to this original atomic upstream stage.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 73f5c5c0ea

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 73f5c5c0ea

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".