docs: add the missing LICENSE, and stop the hero image naming another project - #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… project Two things a machine reads first, both wrong. **No LICENSE.** This repository is public and offered as a worked adoption to read and copy, but with no licence file GitHub and every downstream tool treat it as all rights reserved. Adds the org's Apache-2.0 file, byte-identical to the one in chock, chock-catalog and the plugin repositories. **The hero image's alt text read "Chock logo".** Alt text is the only part of an image a crawler, an LLM retriever or a screen reader reads, and this is the most prominent slot on the page -- so anything reading chock-example was told it was looking at chock. It now says what this repository is, then that the mark is chock's. A licence badge is added now that there is a licence behind it. Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 30, 2026
Merged
The README already says questions and issues belong on the framework repo, but that sits below the fold and a visitor scans the badge row first. Someone who opens a pull request here has already wasted their time by the time they read the prose. Three badges now, and none of them is the "PRs welcome" every sibling carries -- this is a sample for developers to copy, not a project to contribute to: - Demo repository -> the framework - License Apache 2.0 -> the LICENSE added in the previous commit - Issues & PRs -> chock, where they are actually read The licence is unaffected by that posture and still belongs here: it governs what someone may do with this sample, not whether they may send a patch back. Without it nobody could act on "Use this template" at all. Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
open-coder-ai
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 30, 2026 14:46
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The important one: this repository had no licence
It is public and offered as "a working Chock adoption you can read" — something people are meant to copy from. With no
LICENSEfile, GitHub and every downstream tool treat a public repository as all rights reserved, so nobody could safely do the one thing the repository exists for.This adds the org's Apache-2.0 file, byte-identical (
md5 78766eae…) to the one already inchock,chock-catalogand the three plugin repositories. No new licensing decision — this repository now says what every sibling already says.The hero image told crawlers this was chock
The alt text read
Chock logo, and.github/logo.svgis chock's mark byte for byte.Alt text is the only part of an image a crawler, an LLM retriever or a screen reader reads, and it sits in the most prominent slot on the page — so everything reading chock-example was told it was looking at chock. Sharing chock's mark is right for a demo of chock, and the alt now says so; what it could not afford was to name the wrong project and nothing else:
Badge
One licence badge, added now that there is a licence behind it. Nothing else: this repository has no workflows, so a CI or Scorecard badge would be an image of a check that does not run, and the README directs questions and issues to the framework repo, so "PRs welcome" would point people the wrong way.
Same pass applied across the org: chock-quickstart, chock-threat-intel, the three plugin repos, agentseam and chock-catalog.
Generated by Claude Code