Skip to content

#55: Add GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret pass-through and remove committed GPG keys - #356

Open
chetankh239 wants to merge 3 commits into
mosip:release-1.3.xfrom
chetankh239:gpg-migration-release
Open

#55: Add GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret pass-through and remove committed GPG keys#356
chetankh239 wants to merge 3 commits into
mosip:release-1.3.xfrom
chetankh239:gpg-migration-release

Conversation

@chetankh239

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret pass-through to maven-build/maven-publish-to-nexus jobs in .github/workflows/push-trigger.yml, alongside the existing GPG_SECRET.
  • Removes the leaked .github/keys/mosipgpgkey_pub.gpg and .github/keys/mosipgpgkey_sec.gpg from tracking and ignores .github/keys/ going forward.

Test plan

  • Confirm push-trigger.yml still parses/runs on this branch
  • Confirm publish job succeeds once GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret is configured at the org/repo level

Ref: mosip/mosip-labs#55

Adds GPG_PRIVATE_KEY to the maven-build and maven-publish-to-nexus
job secrets for kafka-admin-client, and removes the leaked
.github/keys/mosipgpgkey_*.gpg files from tracking (ignored going forward).

Ref: mosip/mosip-labs#55
Signed-off-by: Chetan Kumar Hirematha <chetankumar.h.239@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@chetankh239, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 90 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d1a285f2-f523-4a4a-b706-72307c30ceb9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61076a7 and 836dab4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/keys/mosipgpgkey_pub.gpg
  • .github/keys/mosipgpgkey_sec.gpg
  • .github/workflows/push-trigger.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chetankh239 chetankh239 changed the title Add GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret pass-through and remove committed GPG keys #55: Add GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret pass-through and remove committed GPG keys Aug 13, 2026
The master-java21 branch of mosip/kattu does not declare
GPG_PRIVATE_KEY as an accepted secret on maven-build.yml/
maven-publish-to-nexus.yml yet; that support currently only exists
on the gpgupdate-masterj21 branch. Repoint the affected job refs so
the newly-added secret is actually valid, per CodeRabbit review on
mosip/commons#1845.

Signed-off-by: Chetan Kumar Hirematha <chetankumar.h.239@gmail.com>
Reference PR mosip/imagedecoder#55 only removes
the leaked key files from tracking; it does not add a .gitignore entry.
Dropping the .github/keys/ ignore rule here to match that pattern.
Note per CodeRabbit: this alone does not remediate the exposure - the
key must still be treated as compromised, rotated, and purged from
history at the org level.

Signed-off-by: Chetan Kumar Hirematha <chetankumar.h.239@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant