Skip to content

chore(docs): create and resolve tracking issues for MVP and Storage decisions - #300

Open
matta wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-12875428471273343503-a588a8c0
Open

chore(docs): create and resolve tracking issues for MVP and Storage decisions#300
matta wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-12875428471273343503-a588a8c0

Conversation

@matta

@matta matta commented Mar 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Creates tracking issues for the following suggested next steps and immediately closes them, as the project has already implemented both requirements:

  • Decide the storage/merge strategy (CRDT op-log vs per-issue files vs JSONL snapshot)
  • Pick the MVP command surface for daily use (search, update, list filters) and implement --json + --help-json across commands

PR created automatically by Jules for task 12875428471273343503 started by @matta

…ecisions

Creates tracking issues for the following suggested next steps and immediately closes them, as the project has already implemented both requirements:
- Decide the storage/merge strategy (CRDT op-log vs per-issue files vs JSONL snapshot)
- Pick the MVP command surface for daily use (search, update, list filters) and implement --json + --help-json across commands

Co-authored-by: matta <37314+matta@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@trunk-io

trunk-io Bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging to main in this repository is managed by Trunk.

  • To merge this pull request, check the box to the left or comment /trunk merge below.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request formalizes two previously completed project decisions by creating and immediately resolving tracking issues. It documents the chosen storage/merge strategy and the defined MVP command surface, ensuring that these architectural and functional decisions are properly recorded within the project's documentation.

Highlights

  • Storage/Merge Strategy Decision Documented: A tracking issue was created and immediately resolved for the decision on storage/merge strategy (CRDT op-log vs per-issue files vs JSONL snapshot), as this requirement has already been implemented.
  • MVP Command Surface Definition Documented: A tracking issue was created and immediately resolved for defining the MVP command surface (search, update, list filters) and implementing --json + --help-json across commands, as this requirement has already been implemented.
Changelog
  • docs/pebble/decide-storage-merge-strategy-crdt-op-log-vs-per-issue-files-vs-jsonl-snapshot.md
    • Created a new documentation file to track the decision regarding the storage/merge strategy, marking it as 'done'.
  • docs/pebble/pick-the-mvp-command-surface-for-daily-use-search-update-list-filters-and-implem.md
    • Created a new documentation file to track the decision regarding the MVP command surface, marking it as 'done'.
Activity
  • The pull request was automatically created by Jules for a task initiated by @matta.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds two markdown files to track and resolve decisions related to the project's MVP. While the files correctly capture the status as 'done', they lack content explaining the resolution. My review includes suggestions to add a summary to each file to improve their value as documentation for future reference.

Comment on lines +1 to +8
---
id: pebl-1k0akk6mru
title: Decide storage/merge strategy (CRDT op-log vs per-issue files vs JSONL snapshot)
status: done
created_at: 2026-03-16T04:41:00.947539863+00:00
modified_at: 2026-03-16T04:43:10.590895361+00:00
resolved_at: 2026-03-16T04:43:10.590887653+00:00
---

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This tracking issue is marked as done, but the file body is empty. To improve the utility of this document for future readers, please add a brief summary of the decision that was made after the frontmatter. For example, you could specify which storage and merge strategy was ultimately chosen.

Comment on lines +1 to +10
---
id: pebl-lm45kx24ij
title: >-
Pick the MVP command surface for daily use (search, update, list filters) and
implement --json + --help-json across commands
status: done
created_at: 2026-03-16T04:41:05.048000121+00:00
modified_at: 2026-03-16T04:43:14.328954105+00:00
resolved_at: 2026-03-16T04:43:14.328946767+00:00
---

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Similar to the other tracking issue, this file would be more valuable if it included a summary of the outcome. Please consider adding a brief description of the MVP command surface that was implemented after the frontmatter to aid future readers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant