Skip to content

docs: update API documentation for compliance with RFC 1574 - #291

Open
matta wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/update-api-docs-rfc1574-10948965845938228074
Open

docs: update API documentation for compliance with RFC 1574#291
matta wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/update-api-docs-rfc1574-10948965845938228074

Conversation

@matta

@matta matta commented Mar 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR updates three public API documentation blocks to fully comply with Rust's RFC 1574 guidelines.

Specifically, it targets:

  1. RunContext::ensure_project in crates/pebble/src/commands.rs (Added # Errors section and third-person summary)
  2. default_datetime in crates/pebble/src/models.rs (Added complete summary, elaboration, and # Examples doctest)
  3. TaskNode::create_new_to_disk in crates/pebble/src/models.rs (Added complete summary detailing TOCTOU prevention, # Errors, and # Examples doctest).

All doctests pass cargo test --doc.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 10948965845938228074 started by @matta

Updated doc comments for `RunContext::ensure_project`, `default_datetime`, and `TaskNode::create_new_to_disk` to align with the RFC 1574 standard. Enhancements include:
- Single-sentence summaries using third-person singular present tense.
- Proper `# Errors` sections for error conditions.
- Self-contained, compilable `# Examples` sections for behavior demonstration.

Co-authored-by: matta <37314+matta@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@trunk-io

trunk-io Bot commented Mar 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging to main in this repository is managed by Trunk.

  • To merge this pull request, check the box to the left or comment /trunk merge below.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the clarity and completeness of public API documentation within the pebble crate. By updating specific function documentation blocks to adhere to Rust's RFC 1574 guidelines, it ensures that users have access to well-structured and informative descriptions, including error conditions and usage examples.

Highlights

  • RunContext::ensure_project documentation: Updated the function's documentation to include a third-person summary and a dedicated "# Errors" section, aligning with RFC 1574.
  • default_datetime documentation: Enhanced the function's documentation with a complete summary, elaboration on its purpose, and an "# Examples" doctest.
  • TaskNode::create_new_to_disk documentation: Provided a comprehensive summary detailing TOCTOU prevention, added an "# Errors" section, and included an "# Examples" doctest.
Changelog
  • crates/pebble/src/commands.rs
    • Updated ensure_project function documentation to include a detailed summary and an "# Errors" section.
  • crates/pebble/src/models.rs
    • Enhanced create_new_to_disk function documentation with a comprehensive summary, "# Errors" section, and an "# Examples" doctest.
    • Improved default_datetime function documentation with a complete summary, elaboration, and an "# Examples" doctest.
Activity
  • PR was automatically created by Jules for a task started by @matta.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves the API documentation to align with Rust's RFC 1574 guidelines, adding more detailed explanations, error sections, and examples. The changes are well-executed. I have one suggestion to improve the determinism of a documentation example by using a fixed timestamp, which also aligns better with the project's conventions for tests and examples.

/// title: "Test Task".into(),
/// status: TaskStatus::todo(),
/// priority: None,
/// created_at: Some(Utc::now()),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using Utc::now() in examples makes them non-deterministic. For reproducibility and consistency with other tests and examples in the project, it's better to use a fixed timestamp. This also aligns with the general rule to use idiomatic and representative data in documentation examples.

        created_at: Some(chrono::DateTime::parse_from_rfc3339("2023-01-01T00:00:00Z")?.with_timezone(&Utc)),
References
  1. Documentation examples should use data that is idiomatic and representative of the project's conventions, not just generic placeholders.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant