fix: limit operator strikes - #884
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0757e3f37b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
0757e3f to
90238c2
Compare
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
vgorkavenko
changed the title
|
|
||
| OperatorStrikes storage rec = _storage().operatorStrikes[input.nodeOperatorId]; | ||
| uint256 previousCount = rec.activeIds.length; | ||
| if (previousCount >= MAX_ACTIVE_STRIKES) revert MaxActiveStrikesReached(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just 'eq' should be enough?
3 participants
Description
Fix too much expired strikes to remove
Checklist
just coverage)