Sync Kaizen dogfood contracts

[s-hiraoku]

Summary

• Sync deterministic Kaizen dogfood contracts from kaizen-agents-org/.github.
• Update only the manifest-managed shared skills, issue template, Kaizen config, and agent guidance.

Verification

• Automated sync copied and compared every manifest-managed path.

Generated by the daily dogfood sync workflow.

Source issue: not supplied by this automated sync run.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated audit guidance to use consistent sh code fences.
  • Clarified pagination validation for multi-page results, including missing, empty, or repeated cursors.
  • Documented safer cursor handling for review-thread and nested comment pagination.
  • Corrected nested comment pagination examples to begin with an empty cursor.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2f9c0129-c19e-49dc-8de2-09cbf91e1ff3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf658dd and b29c27b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The audit guidance validates next-page cursors for review threads and nested review comments. Each loop rejects missing or repeated cursors before updating its cursor.

Changes

Pagination cursor validation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Cursor validation skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md	Review-thread and nested-comment pagination reject missing or repeated cursors. Each loop updates its cursor only after validation.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• kaizen-agents-org/coderabbit#48: Modifies the same review-thread and nested-comment pagination examples.
• kaizen-agents-org/builder-agent#144: Modifies the same pagination loops with different cursor-related handling.
• kaizen-agents-org/verifier#158: Modifies review-thread and nested-comment pagination logic.

Suggested reviewers: actions-user

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the stated objective to synchronize Kaizen dogfood contracts and is consistent with the pull request changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/daily-dogfood-sync

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md`:
- Around line 96-100: Restore repeated-cursor detection in both pagination
loops, including the nested comment loop: when hasNextPage is true, validate
that the fetched endCursor differs from the current cursor before assigning it.
Fail closed with an error if the cursor repeats, while preserving normal
endCursor propagation until hasNextPage is false.
- Line 17: Change the code fence immediately before the audit command in
pr-feedback-audit.md from sh to bash so the Bash-specific args array, [[ ]]
conditionals, and here-string execute under the correct interpreter.

🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 57a7fae8-82dc-4a7d-bcf8-39c28c18907b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7cea2c and cf658dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• skills/pr-guardian/references/pr-feedback-audit.md

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cf658dd399

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[s-hiraoku]

@codex review

Please review current HEAD b29c27b. It restores Bash fences, fail-closed cursor validation, repeated-cursor protection in both loops, and continuation of nested pagination from the outer cursor.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: b29c27b2e2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[s-hiraoku]

PR Guardian update for current HEAD b29c27b2e21a14fd2a6bf58bc26c2f45fe962d92:

• restored Bash fences and fail-closed cursor pagination safeguards
• replied to and resolved all 3 review threads (unresolved: 0)
• Validate CodeRabbit config succeeded
• CodeRabbit reviewed the current HEAD with no actionable comments
• Codex reviewed the current HEAD and found no major issues
• GitHub reports the PR mergeable and non-draft

No merge was performed.