Skip to content

fix(deps, pyamber): bump setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in /amber#6412

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/amber/setuptools-83.0.0
Open

fix(deps, pyamber): bump setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in /amber#6412
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/amber/setuptools-83.0.0

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in /amber.

Context for the existing dependency entry: Texera does not import setuptools directly. PyAmber imports PyFilesystem2 (fs) in amber/src/main/python/core/architecture/managers/executor_manager.py, and fs==2.4.16 imports pkg_resources at module import time. pkg_resources is provided by setuptools, which is why setuptools is listed in amber/requirements.txt.

Bumps [setuptools](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools) from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/blob/main/NEWS.rst)
- [Commits](pypa/setuptools@v80.10.2...v83.0.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: setuptools
  dependency-version: 83.0.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code labels Jul 14, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated Reviewer Suggestions

Based on the git blame history of the changed files, we recommend the following reviewers:

  • No candidates found from git blame history.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Benchmark changes need a look

🟢 0 better · 🔴 4 worse · ⚪ 11 noise (<±5%) · 0 without baseline

Compared against main 2e5c99c benchmarked on this same runner, so the delta is largely free of cross-runner hardware noise. The "7d avg" column still reflects the gh-pages dashboard. Treat <±5% as noise unless repeated.

Dashboard · Run

config throughput MB/s latency max Δ latest / 7d
🔴 bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 396 0.242 24,260/33,118/33,118 us 🔴 -6.4% / 🔴 +128.6%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 798 0.487 122,444/146,236/146,236 us ⚪ within ±5% / 🔴 +45.5%
🔴 bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 928 0.566 1,068,933/1,212,264/1,212,264 us 🔴 +8.9% / 🔴 +25.3%
Baseline details

Latest main 2e5c99c from same runner

config metric PR latest main 7d avg Δ latest Δ 7d
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 396 tuples/sec 423 tuples/sec 830.77 tuples/sec -6.4% -52.3%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.242 MB/s 0.258 MB/s 0.507 MB/s -6.2% -52.3%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p50 24,260 us 24,465 us 11,905 us -0.8% +103.8%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p95 33,118 us 31,757 us 14,486 us +4.3% +128.6%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p99 33,118 us 31,757 us 19,430 us +4.3% +70.4%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 798 tuples/sec 822 tuples/sec 1,082 tuples/sec -2.9% -26.3%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.487 MB/s 0.502 MB/s 0.66 MB/s -3.0% -26.3%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p50 122,444 us 121,869 us 93,412 us +0.5% +31.1%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p95 146,236 us 148,661 us 100,489 us -1.6% +45.5%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p99 146,236 us 148,661 us 111,365 us -1.6% +31.3%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 928 tuples/sec 935 tuples/sec 1,104 tuples/sec -0.7% -15.9%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.566 MB/s 0.571 MB/s 0.674 MB/s -0.9% -16.0%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p50 1,068,933 us 1,064,433 us 925,459 us +0.4% +15.5%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p95 1,212,264 us 1,112,934 us 967,138 us +8.9% +25.3%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p99 1,212,264 us 1,112,934 us 997,758 us +8.9% +21.5%
Raw CSV
config_idx,batch_size,schema_width,string_len,num_batches,total_ms,total_tuples,total_bytes,tuples_per_sec,mb_per_sec,lat_p50_us,lat_p95_us,lat_p99_us
0,10,10,64,20,505.15,200,128000,396,0.242,24259.85,33117.63,33117.63
1,100,10,64,20,2504.92,2000,1280000,798,0.487,122443.60,146235.79,146235.79
2,1000,10,64,20,21556.67,20000,12800000,928,0.566,1068933.19,1212263.53,1212263.53

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Amber (pyamber) Python dependency pin for setuptools to the latest specified version, keeping the Amber Python environment current and consistent with the project’s pinned-dependency approach.

Changes:

  • Bump setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in amber/requirements.txt.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.16%. Comparing base (2e5c99c) to head (9bdd0d7).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #6412      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     69.90%   70.16%   +0.26%     
- Complexity     3380     3385       +5     
============================================
  Files          1142     1142              
  Lines         44844    44844              
  Branches       4949     4949              
============================================
+ Hits          31346    31465     +119     
+ Misses        11849    11739     -110     
+ Partials       1649     1640       -9     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
access-control-service 70.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
agent-service 76.76% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
amber 66.65% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
computing-unit-managing-service 9.97% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
config-service 52.30% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
file-service 65.63% <ø> (+1.65%) ⬆️ Carriedforward from 6d768f4
frontend 68.91% <ø> (+0.57%) ⬆️ Carriedforward from 6d768f4
notebook-migration-service 78.94% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4
pyamber 91.19% <ø> (ø)
workflow-compiling-service 55.14% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 6d768f4

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread amber/requirements.txt

# Not imported directly: `fs` needs pkg_resources at import time (#4199).
setuptools==80.10.2
setuptools==83.0.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need to keep setuptools again?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do not import setuptools directly in Texera. It is kept because PyAmber imports PyFilesystem2 (fs) in amber/src/main/python/core/architecture/managers/executor_manager.py, and fs==2.4.16 imports pkg_resources at module import time. pkg_resources is provided by setuptools, so the requirement keeps that indirect import available.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we just remove setuptools? if fs depends on pkg_resources, then it should declare pkg_resources as its dependency?

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci changes related to CI label Jul 15, 2026
@aglinxinyuan aglinxinyuan changed the title fix(deps, pyamber): bump setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in /amber fix(deps, pyamber): keep setuptools below 81 Jul 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Thanks for opening this pull request, @dependabot[bot]!

It looks like the pull request description doesn't quite follow our template yet:

  • The What changes were proposed in this PR? section is missing; please keep the template's headings.
  • The How was this PR tested? section is missing; please keep the template's headings.
  • The Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? section is missing; please keep the template's headings.

Filling out the template helps reviewers understand and triage your contribution faster. Please edit the description to complete it. This message will disappear automatically once the template is followed.

You can find the template prompts by editing the description, or see CONTRIBUTING.md for the full contribution flow.

@aglinxinyuan aglinxinyuan changed the title fix(deps, pyamber): keep setuptools below 81 fix(deps, pyamber): bump setuptools from 80.10.2 to 83.0.0 in /amber Jul 15, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the ci changes related to CI label Jul 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file pyamber python Pull requests that update python code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants