GH-50915: [FORMAT] Allow TIMESTAMP logical type to annotate FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(12) - #50916
Open
divjotarora wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
GH-50915: [FORMAT] Allow TIMESTAMP logical type to annotate FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(12)#50916divjotarora wants to merge 3 commits into
divjotarora wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
|
|
emkornfield
reviewed
Aug 20, 2026
emkornfield
reviewed
Aug 20, 2026
emkornfield
reviewed
Aug 20, 2026
emkornfield
reviewed
Aug 20, 2026
emkornfield
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some questions and comments I think the biggest one is scope and whether we should have an option to convert this value to a proper arrow type. Wemight also want to make it configurable the target of the arrow type
emkornfield
reviewed
Sep 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
See apache/parquet-format#600 for rationale.
What changes are included in this PR?
This PR adds support for using
TimestampTypeto annotateFIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(12)values.Are these changes tested?
Yes, via unit tests and an e2e test that reads the file added in parquet-testing (apache/parquet-testing#123).
Are there any user-facing changes?
No