Skip to content

Improve arrow-avro decoding for one-record messages - #10713

Open
jordepic wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jordepic:arrow-avro-one-datum-null-runs-10712
Open

Improve arrow-avro decoding for one-record messages#10713
jordepic wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jordepic:arrow-avro-one-datum-null-runs-10712

Conversation

@jordepic

@jordepic jordepic commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

Some messaging systems deliver records one at a time. For example, Kafka gives a consumer the complete byte array for one message, so the consumer already knows where that message begins and ends. If that message contains one Avro record, the decoder does not need an Avro header to identify the record boundary.

This is not limited to schema-registry-framed Avro. Apache Flink supports both format = 'avro-confluent', where each Kafka message includes a Confluent header containing its schema ID, and format = 'avro', where each message contains a bare Avro datum with no Confluent header. For the latter, Flink derives the writer schema from the table definition, so the consumer already knows the schema even though the payload carries no schema ID or framing. Supporting this format with the existing decoder currently requires manufacturing a synthetic prefix and copying every message.

In Avro terminology, one encoded value is called a datum. A datum can be a primitive value or a complete record.

The existing Decoder::decode method expects each record to include an Avro framing prefix. That prefix identifies the Avro format and the writer schema. A caller that already has one complete Kafka message and already knows its schema must therefore add a temporary prefix and copy the payload before decoding it, or separately inspect the schema to determine how many bytes belong to the record.

Nullable nested records have a separate performance cost. Consider an event with three optional nested records where only one is populated on each row. For every absent record, the decoder currently walks through all of its child fields and immediately appends placeholder values. Long sequences of absent records repeat the same work row by row.

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Add Decoder::decode_datum, which decodes one complete Avro value directly from the supplied bytes using the writer schema already selected on the decoder. It returns the number of bytes used by that value, leaving any remaining bytes untouched.
  • Record consecutive null values immediately in the validity bitmap, but postpone adding their child placeholders. When a non-null value arrives, or the batch is flushed, add the accumulated placeholders as one run.
  • Add a benchmark representing three optional nested event records, with the populated record changing every 100 rows.

The second change only affects how the decoder builds arrays internally. The returned Arrow arrays are unchanged, and all child arrays are brought to the correct length before a batch is returned.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

  • cargo test -p arrow-avro --all-features: 479 unit tests passed; 26 documentation tests passed; 1 documentation test ignored.
  • cargo clippy -p arrow-avro --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
  • cargo fmt --all -- --check

The benchmark below decodes all 10,000 rows into one batch. It was run on an Apple M1 Max against a saved main baseline.

Benchmark main median this PR median Change
Three sparse optional nested records 820.16 us 581.44 us 29.2% less time, or 41.3% more throughput

Command:

cargo bench -p arrow-avro --bench decoder -- 'SparseNested\(Struct\)/10000' --baseline main

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes. Decoder gains a new, non-breaking decode_datum method for callers that already have the complete bytes for one Avro value and have already selected its writer schema. Existing decoding methods and framed input behavior are unchanged.

AI assistance disclosure: Codex was used to help port the implementation, draft tests and the benchmark, and prepare the issue and PR text. The resulting code and all reported outputs were reviewed before submission, and I take responsibility for the contribution.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added arrow Changes to the arrow crate arrow-avro arrow-avro crate labels Aug 17, 2026
@jordepic jordepic changed the title Improve arrow-avro transport-bounded datum decoding Improve arrow-avro decoding for one-record messages Aug 17, 2026
@alamb

alamb commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FYI @jecsand838 -- could you help review this PR?

@jecsand838

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FYI @jecsand838 -- could you help review this PR?

Absolutely! I'll have time tonight / tomorrow morning to review this.

@kinshuk-bb

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jordepic is there currently a way to convert multiple Avro Datums in a single .avro to a RecordBatches directly? A Raw Binary Encoded Avro

@jordepic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kinshuk-bb Yes, for raw binary Avro containing multiple back-to-back datums encoded with the same known writer schema, this PR supports decoding them directly into RecordBatches without adding framing. Configure a Decoder with that writer schema, repeatedly call decode_datum on the remaining byte slice, advance by the returned consumed-byte count, and call flush whenever batch_is_full (plus once at the end). Each call decodes exactly one datum and leaves subsequent datums untouched.

If by .avro you mean a standard Avro object-container file, that is already supported today: ReaderBuilder::build reads the container header/schema and iterates over RecordBatches. The new method is specifically for raw datum streams/messages without an object-container header or per-record framing.

I am adding explicit coverage for concatenated raw datums and batch boundaries to make this use case clear.

@jordepic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@jecsand838 if you have any time to take a look in the next few days I'd greatly appreciate it! This is a really big win for StreamFusion and any other system trying to beat out avro processing from the JVM!

@kinshuk-bb

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jordepic thank you! i was relying on adding framing just to decode to be sure i wouldn't face issues. will try this out now. An addition to the cargo docs that this is directly possible now would be great.

@jordepic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kinshuk-bb Addressed in 92a4210: the crate-level documentation now includes a runnable example decoding consecutive bare Avro datums directly with Decoder::decode_datum, and the reader/module/builder docs plus README now explicitly list unframed binary datums as a supported format.

@jecsand838 jecsand838 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jordepic Thank you so much for getting this PR up!

LMGTM. I left a few comments. Let me know what you think.

Comment thread arrow-avro/src/reader/mod.rs Outdated
Comment on lines +744 to +767
/// Decode exactly one unframed Avro datum with the active writer schema.
///
/// This is intended for transports such as Kafka where the message boundary is external to
/// Avro. It returns the number of datum bytes consumed, allowing the caller to ignore transport
/// payload bytes after the first datum when its format contract requires that behavior.
/// Consecutive unframed datums can be decoded by repeatedly passing the unconsumed suffix.
/// If the current batch is full, this method returns `Ok(0)` until [`Self::flush`] is called.
///
/// The decoder must already have the desired active fingerprint, and this method does not
/// inspect or switch framing fingerprints.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns an error if the datum is incomplete, malformed, or incompatible with the active
/// writer schema.
pub fn decode_datum(&mut self, data: &[u8]) -> Result<usize, AvroError> {
if self.remaining_capacity == 0 {
return Ok(0);
}
let consumed = self.active_decoder.decode(data, 1)?;
self.remaining_capacity -= 1;
self.awaiting_body = false;
Ok(consumed)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd recommend we avoid adding a second public decoding method and instead select the input grammar when building the decoder.

A decoder should generally consume one stable wire format for its lifetime, and this follows existing arrow-rs patterns such as arrow_json::StructMode, IPC’s DictionaryHandling, and the Avro writer’s construction-time choice between AvroSoeFormat and AvroBinaryFormat.

I suggest replacing decode_datum with:

#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Default, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum DecoderMode {
    #[default]
    Framed,
    UnframedDatum,
}

Then expose:

pub fn with_decoder_mode(mut self, mode: DecoderMode) -> Self {
    self.decoder_mode = mode;
    self
}

Decoder::decode can dispatch internally:

pub fn decode(&mut self, data: &[u8]) -> Result<usize, AvroError> {
    match self.mode {
        DecoderMode::Framed => self.decode_framed(data),
        DecoderMode::UnframedDatum => self.decode_unframed(data),
    }
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good suggestion!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implemented in 2a5f2d9. The public decode_datum method is gone; ReaderBuilder::with_decoder_mode now selects DecoderMode::Framed (default) or DecoderMode::UnframedDatum at construction, and Decoder::decode dispatches internally. Updated the crate/module/builder docs, runnable example, README, and existing unframed tests to use the single decoding entry point.

Comment on lines +760 to +762
if self.remaining_capacity == 0 {
return Ok(0);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new unframed mode may make Ok(0) too ambiguous. An empty record or a record containing only null fields is a valid datum that consumes zero bytes but still appends one row. The same result currently means the batch was already full and no row was appended. A caller that interprets zero as flush and retry can therefore duplicate a successfully decoded row.

I'd recommending giving batch-full a distinct outcome such as AvroError::BatchFull or something along those lines:

if self.capacity == 0 {
    return Err(AvroError::BatchFull);
}

// A successful zero-width datum remains unambiguously Ok(0)
let consumed = self.active_decoder.decode(data, 1)?;
self.capacity -= 1;
Ok(consumed)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed in 2a5f2d9 with AvroError::BatchFull for unframed decoding when capacity is exhausted. A successful zero-width datum still returns Ok(0), and the new regression test covers both an empty record and a record containing only a null field, including flushing and decoding another row without duplication.

Comment thread arrow-avro/src/reader/record.rs Outdated
}
Self::Union(u) => u.append_null()?,
Self::Nullable(_, null_buffer, inner) => {
Self::Nullable(_, null_buffer, _, pending_nulls) => {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This defers child placeholders, but each null still calls NullBufferBuilder::append(false), so long null runs retain one bitmap write per row. The non-null path also calls the large append_nulls dispatcher when pending_nulls == 0.

Could we defer both the validity suffix and child placeholders behind one helper?

#[inline]
fn materialize_pending(
    validity: &mut NullBufferBuilder,
    values: &mut Decoder,
    pending: &mut usize,
) -> Result<(), AvroError> {
    let count = *pending;
    if count == 0 {
        return Ok(());
    }

    values.append_nulls(count)?;
    validity.append_n_nulls(count);
    *pending = 0;
    Ok(())
}

Null branches would only increment pending_nulls. Before a non-null/default value or flush, call this helper; after successfully decoding a value, call validity.append_non_null(). This makes long and all-null runs bulk operations and avoids zero-count dispatch on dense nullable data.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implemented in 2a5f2d9. NullableDecoder::materialize_pending now bulk-materializes child placeholders and the validity suffix together, while null branches only increment pending_nulls. Non-null/default paths skip the bulk dispatcher when no nulls are pending and append validity only after the value succeeds. Added a regression test that verifies neither bitmap nor child values are touched during a 64-row null run.

Comment thread arrow-avro/src/reader/record.rs Outdated
Comment on lines +773 to +776
other => {
for _ in 0..count {
other.append_null()?;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The catch-all calls append_null() count times, re-running the full Decoder match for every placeholder. Consequently, nullable arrays, maps, fixed values, UUIDs, enums, decimals, custom primitives, and REE do not receive the intended bulk optimization.

Perhaps add direct bulk arms where possible? for example:

Self::Uuid(values) => {
    values.resize(values.len() + 16 * count, 0);
}
Self::Fixed(width, values) => {
    values.resize(values.len() + (*width as usize) * count, 0);
}
Self::Enum(values, _, _) => {
    values.resize(values.len() + count, 0);
}
Self::Decimal128(_, _, _, builder) => {
    builder.append_value_n(0, count);
}
Self::Decimal256(_, _, _, builder) => {
    builder.append_value_n(i256::ZERO, count);
}
Self::RunEndEncoded(_, len, inner) => {
    inner.append_nulls(count)?;
    *len += count;
}

For offset-backed types, we could reserve count offsets before pushing repeated zero lengths. I would also make the match exhaustive and keep any necessarily per-row union handling explicit, so future variants cannot silently fall back to a slower implementation. This could always be looked into as a follow-up.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed in 2a5f2d9. append_nulls now matches Decoder exhaustively and has direct bulk arms for arrays/maps/strings with reserved offsets, fixed values, UUIDs, enums, all decimal widths, duration builders, custom primitive/temporal types, nested records, and run-end encoding. Union handling remains explicitly per-row where required, and append_null simply delegates to append_nulls(1).

Comment thread arrow-avro/src/reader/record.rs Outdated
Comment on lines +279 to +280
/// Nullable value plus trailing null placeholders not yet materialized in the child decoder.
Nullable(NullablePlan, NullBufferBuilder, Box<Decoder>, usize),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding pending_nulls as a fourth positional field makes the nullable state transitions difficult to audit across append_null, append_nulls, append_default, decode, and flush.

Could this state be represented by a named structure?

struct NullableDecoder {
    plan: NullablePlan,
    validity: NullBufferBuilder,
    values: Box<Decoder>,
    pending_nulls: usize,
}

A materialize_pending() method on this structure would centralize the invariant and ensure every transition updates the child, validity bitmap, and pending count consistently. If append_nulls is made exhaustive, append_null() could also delegate to append_nulls(1), removing the duplicated per-variant implementation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implemented in 2a5f2d9 with a named NullableDecoder containing plan, validity, values, and pending_nulls. Its materialize_pending method owns the shared invariant, and append_null, bulk append, defaults, decoding, and flush all transition through that representation consistently.

@jordepic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@alamb would you mind rerunning this guy?

@jordepic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Sorry @alamb silly clippy formatting issue, could we give it another go?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

arrow Changes to the arrow crate arrow-avro arrow-avro crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve arrow-avro decoding of transport-bounded datums and null runs

4 participants