Prepare providers release 2026-08-08 - #71310
Open
potiuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
eladkal
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Google-only wave, following the removal of
googlefrom the 2026-08-06 wave ona binding -1 (the provider does not install on Python 3.14 — tracked in #71268,
worked around in #71273).
google22.3.0 was cut as rc1/rc2/rc3 but never published, so its existingchangelog section is extended rather than superseded and the version stays
22.3.0 — it will be cut as 22.3.0rc4.
source-date-epochis unchanged for thesame reason.
Changelog entries added for the commits that landed after the 2026-08-06 cut:
Misc(dependency change; the commit subject says"google-claude-aiplatform" and "Python 3.15", both of which are wrong, so the
entry is reworded to what actually shipped)
to a historic changelog note)
No inter-provider
>=floor changed, so this does not need theallow provider dependency bumplabel.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 5) following the guidelines