Fix google provider install failure on Python 3.14 - #71269
Closed
vatsrahul1001 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
potiuk
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
closing in favour of #71273 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Gate
google-cloud-aiplatform[evaluation]to Python < 3.14, falling back to plaingoogle-cloud-aiplatformon 3.14.apache-airflow-providers-googleis currently uninstallable on Python 3.14: theevaluationextra pullslitellm, butgoogle-cloud-aiplatform(latest 1.163.0) caps the extra atlitellm<1.86.0, and no litellm in that range works on 3.14 (1.95.0+ does, but it is above the cap).pip install apache-airflow-providers-googletherefore fails withResolutionImpossibleon 3.14, even though the provider advertisesrequires_python >=3.10.This gates the evaluation extra to
python_version < '3.14'so 3.14 installs the base aiplatform without the litellm-bearing extra. Everything else is unaffected. Removal of the workaround (once aiplatform raises its litellm ceiling to a 3.14-capable version) is tracked in #71268.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines