Lead with the five words, and put the customer above the argument - #16
Lead with the five words, and put the customer above the argument#16vertix wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
The home page explained the service before it said what kind of evaluation it is, so the five words now sit under the lede: independent, continuous, commercial tasks, at scale, public and private. The Runway testimonial moves out of Protocol to just under the partner band. A customer's sentence outranks our own reasoning, so a reader meets it first. Problem opens on a published number — 64 picks an hour against a person's 1,300 — and drops from four points to two. A third way through sits between the argument and the protocol; the action was only at the top and the foot. About answers who rather than what: the founders' heading names what they did before, the independence paragraph no longer repeats the home page's service description, and 'rigs' becomes 'robots ... fixed stations', which is a word a reader outside this field already has. Requested-by: Inessa Roman Ticket: Positronic-Robotics/internal#1052 #refs
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Deploying website with
|
| Latest commit: |
6505393
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://3b5a172b.website-7m7.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://website-review-first-pass.website-7m7.pages.dev |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6ba834bd92
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| .home .lead-number b { color: var(--accent, #b1e74f); font-weight: 600; } | ||
|
|
||
| /* A third way through, between the argument and the protocol. */ | ||
| .home .midcall { margin-top: 8px; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When this CTA follows the Method band, the earlier .home .band + .band selector wins because it has higher specificity, so this 8px declaration is never applied; the CTA instead receives 92px of top space on desktop and 64px on narrow screens, followed by another full band gap before Protocol. Use an equally or more specific selector such as .home .band + .midcall so the intended compact interstitial layout actually renders.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
First pass on the website review, items 1, 3, 7 and 9 of the twelve in the recommendations doc, plus the About changes asked for on 3 September. Copy and layout only — no new assets, nothing that waits on the vector mark or on analytics access.
What changes
The five words, under the hero lede. Independent · Continuous · Commercial tasks · At scale · Public and private. The page explained the service before it said what kind of evaluation it is. The global
ulrule setsflex-direction: column, so.credsopts out of it explicitly — without that the five words stack.The Runway testimonial moves up, out of the Protocol band and into its own band directly under the partner row. A customer's sentence outranks our own reasoning, so a reader meets it before the argument rather than after it. It is inside the consent Andy Chen gave on 24 June 2026, and moving it up the page is covered by that consent.
Problem opens on a published number — 64 picks an hour against a person's 1,300, from the LinkedIn post of 31 March 2026 — and drops from four points to two. It was long and it was all text.
A third way through, between the argument and the protocol. The action appeared only at the top and the foot.
About answers who, not what. The founders' heading becomes "Founded by two veterans of Google Search ranking". The independence paragraph no longer repeats the home page's service description, and says what independence rests on instead. "Rigs" becomes "robots … fixed stations" — a reader outside this field does not have the word.
What is deliberately not here
The press row is item 6 and it is blocked, not skipped: we hold the three outlet names and dates but not the three article URLs, and an unlinked publication name is unverifiable. It goes on About, not the home page foot, once the URLs exist.
Items 2, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12 need assets or a decision and follow separately.
Checked
Built and read in a browser at 1280 px rather than from the build log. The five words sit on one row, the testimonial renders above the Problem band, and the mid-page line resolves to the contact anchor and the booking link.