Skip to content

feat(skills): ce:write + ce:prose-review — prose-native writing workflow#10

Open
jcasimir wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ce-write-prose-review
Open

feat(skills): ce:write + ce:prose-review — prose-native writing workflow#10
jcasimir wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ce-write-prose-review

Conversation

@jcasimir

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Two prose-native skills that power a writing workflow, composed by the new Perkins orchestrator (in the ce-reviewers-jsl personas repo, separate PR). Existing ce:plan/ce:work/ce:review are code/diff-flavored — ce:review literally errors "no diff scope detected" on prose — so writing needs its own generation and review skills.

Skills

  • ce:write — voice-guided generation in three stages (stage:develop → brief, stage:outline → outline, stage:draft → draft), mirroring how ce:user-scenarios uses stage:. Per-stage procedure lives in references/ so the skill stays lean. Reads a voice guide (~/.config/compound-engineering/voice-guide.md; a project-local docs/writing/voice-guide.md wins).
  • ce:prose-review — dispatches the seven category: writing reviewers in parallel against a target file, merges/dedups findings, synthesizes by theme. report + headless modes; never edits the draft (revision is the orchestrator's loop). No git diff needed — the draft file is the unit of review.

Why a separate panel

The seven writing reviewers and the Perkins orchestrator live in ce-reviewers-jsl (canonical persona home, synced via /ce:refresh). This PR is only the machinery. Land both PRs, then /ce:refresh, then /ce:run perkins "<what to write>".

Notes

  • No version bump (per plugin contributor rules). README skills table updated; frontmatter validates (descriptions quoted, backtick reference paths).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Add two prose-native skills that the Perkins writing orchestrator (in the
ce-reviewers-jsl personas repo) composes. Neither needs a git diff — the
unit of work is a prose file, not a code change.

- skills/ce-write — voice-guided generation in three stages
  (stage:develop → brief, stage:outline → outline, stage:draft → draft),
  mirroring how ce:user-scenarios uses stage:. Per-stage procedure lives
  in references/ so the skill stays lean. Reads the voice guide
  (~/.config/compound-engineering/voice-guide.md, project override wins).
- skills/ce-prose-review — dispatches the seven category:writing reviewers
  in parallel against a target file, merges/dedups findings, and
  synthesizes by theme. report + headless modes; never edits the draft
  (revision is the orchestrator's loop).

No version bump per contributor rules. README skills table updated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant