feat: séparer snippets, documents et preuves#24
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Résumé
Pourquoi
Un extrait de moteur de recherche est une piste de découverte, pas une preuve. Le claim ne devient
supportedqu'après création d'une preuve correspondant exactement à un passage du document récupéré.La nouvelle fixture le démontre : le snippet affirme que l'API est illimitée, tandis que le document indique que l'usage API est facturé séparément. Seul le passage du document est lié au claim.
Vérifications
source_titledans la preuve ;18 passed in 0.05s;18 passed in 0.08s;git diff --checkréussi.Ticket
Implémente #4. Le ticket sera fermé manuellement après fusion dans
develop.