Skip to content

Vendor the source document into the repo - #2

Merged
tytremblay merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vendor-source-document
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

Vendor the source document into the repo#2
tytremblay merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vendor-source-document

Conversation

@tytremblay

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The README, docs/policy-mapping.md, and CLAUDE.md all cite Moving Team Communication to Slack by section number, but the document itself lived in a personal Obsidian vault. Every § in this repo pointed at something a clone could not open.

Adds it as docs/moving-team-communication-to-slack.md and links it from the three places that name it. CLAUDE.md previously pointed at obsidian/Areas/FRC/...; that path is now the in-repo copy.

Two judgment calls

The trailing note to the author is dropped. It is an editorial exchange, not article text. Both of its points are substantive, so they are kept in a provenance header instead:

  • the nonprofit-pricing/educator-status tension in §5 is unresolved and worth re-checking at renewal
  • clause 1 quoted in §8 is typical language for that policy family, not confirmed Melrose text — if it turns out not to be in IJNDD, that whole conditional goes away

The body is otherwise verbatim. Code cites these sections by number, so the document is a fixed reference rather than a page to keep current. Where later reading of the FIRST rules corrected §3 and §7 — "Lead Coach" as an access role, Mentor Ready being non-blocking — policy-mapping.md already records it, and the header points there rather than editing the source.

Prettier reflowed the §5 cost table. Docs only; no code changes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The README, docs/policy-mapping.md, and CLAUDE.md all cite _Moving Team
Communication to Slack_ by section number, but the document itself lived in
a personal Obsidian vault. Every § in this repo pointed at something a
clone could not open.

Add it under docs/ and link it from the three places that name it.

The body is verbatim. The trailing note to the author is not part of the
article, so it is dropped, but both of its points are substantive and are
kept in a provenance header: the nonprofit-pricing/educator-status tension
in §5 is unresolved, and clause 1 quoted in §8 is typical language for that
policy family rather than confirmed Melrose text. The header also points at
policy-mapping.md, which already records where later reading of the FIRST
rules corrected §3 and §7.

Nothing else in the body is edited. Code cites these sections by number,
so the document is a fixed reference, not a page to keep current.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tytremblay
tytremblay merged commit 77f9e75 into main Aug 17, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant