Skip to content

fix(docs): accurate OSS tables per owner feedback - #2

Merged
BenKalsky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
readme-fixes
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

fix(docs): accurate OSS tables per owner feedback#2
BenKalsky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
readme-fixes

Conversation

@BenKalsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Owner-requested corrections: Notary / notary-memory-kit and sumit-api / sumit-react each get their own row; digitizer-pro-tools moves to the WordPress & Web table with its real description (modular WP toolbox plugin, 9 modules); Pulse and AgencyOS removed from the products table (internal tools).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Split Notary and notary-memory-kit into separate rows
- Split sumit-api and sumit-react into separate rows
- Move digitizer-pro-tools to WordPress & Web with its real
  description: modular WP toolbox plugin, 9 modules
- Drop Pulse and AgencyOS from products (internal tools)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@BenKalsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 2, 2026 16:44

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the organization profile README OSS tables to reflect owner feedback by splitting combined entries, relocating a project to the correct category with a more accurate description, and removing internal-only tools from the public products list.

Changes:

  • Split combined rows into separate entries for Notary vs notary-memory-kit, and sumit-api vs sumit-react.
  • Move digitizer-pro-tools to the WordPress & Web section and update its description to match the project’s purpose.
  • Remove Pulse and AgencyOS from Our Products (internal tools).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: 99be62817c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@BenKalsky
BenKalsky merged commit 4b8326f into main Aug 2, 2026
1 check passed
@BenKalsky
BenKalsky deleted the readme-fixes branch August 2, 2026 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants