Add rigorous free local language model screening - #3
Draft
DevHabito wants to merge 134 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
UNDERSTANDwhile preserving the shared E044 schema;Why
The 1.5B candidate was too slow on the target notebook. The faster 0.8B candidate exposed two separate issues: llama.cpp does not enforce continuous
numberbounds in its JSON-schema grammar subset, and the model can copy a stale expression instead of answering the current request. The change repairs only the demonstrated numeric grammar gap and records the remaining quality failure without promoting the model.User and developer impact
Validation