Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

268 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

prof-correctness

A small tool to make it simple to write profiler correctness tests which run known test programs and make assertions on the resulting profiles. Checkout #profiling-library-pager to get notified of test failures.

Setup

Pre-requisites

Install go >= 1.25.1: brew install go, choco install go, etc. Install docker.

Python lint (scenario workloads)

CI and local checks use Ruff. Install once:

pip install -r requirements-dev.txt
./scripts/lint          # check (matches the ci.yml ruff job)
./scripts/format        # auto-fix formatting and lint

Optional git hooks (skip on Datadog laptops that use global core.hooksPath — run ./scripts/lint manually instead):

pip install pre-commit
pre-commit install

Ruff version is pinned only in requirements-dev.txt.

Running Tests

go test -v -run TestScenarios # Run all scenarios

TEST_SCENARIOS="ddprof.*"  go test -v -run TestScenarios # Run ddprof scenarios

Using as a GitHub Action

You may use this repo to run the analyzer on your profiler emitted pprof files. You can do so by adding a GitHub Action Workflow to your repo, where you build your profiler and run it on an example program. After you did this, you can add a step to analyze your results and match it against your expectation:

      - name: Check profiler correctness for allocations
        uses: Datadog/prof-correctness/analyze
        with:
          expected_json: profiling/tests/correctness/allocations.json
          pprof_path: profiling/tests/correctness/allocations/

You need to provide a JSON file with your expectations and a path to where to find the pprof files.

Downstream from dd-trace-py

dd-trace-py triggers this repo after building wheels for a commit. The downstream-python.yml workflow installs ddtrace from the S3 wheel for that SHA (DDTRACE_INSTALL_URL) and runs selected Python scenarios.

Trigger (non-blocking):

Source When Where to see results
GitLab prof-correctness job After upload all; profiling path changes on main or MR prof-correctness Actions — filter by commit SHA

GitLab uses dd-octo-sts (dd-trace-py.gitlab.trigger-ci) to call gh workflow run downstream-python.yml. You can also trigger downstream-python.yml manually via workflow_dispatch.

Inputs:

  • dd_trace_py_commit_sha — commit to test (required)
  • test_scenarios — regexp passed to TEST_SCENARIOS (dd-trace-py passes the 22-scenario 3.14/3.15 migration gate; the downstream workflow default alone is python.*)

Creating new tests

Define the dockerfile

Create a test scenario and prefix the folders with something relevant like php, ddprof, go... The dockerfile specifies how to install the profiler and run the test app. The dockerfile needs to follow rules

  • set variable EXECUTION_TIME_SEC (which defines how long the tests runs for)
  • output pprof data to the /app/data/ folder The /app/data mirrors the data folder in this repository.
# Define OS / Install App...
# Install profiler...
# Run things
ENV EXECUTION_TIME_SEC="60"
# Default is that test data is dropped in the data folder
ENV DD_PROFILING_PPROF_PREFIX="/app/data/profiles_"
CMD ["ddprof", "-l", "notice", "/app/build/some_app" ]

The ./profilers folder contains helpers.

Describe the expected output

Expected values should be derived from what the workload is designed to produce (equal time slices, known byte ratios, N threads × duration, and so on). Capture the observed profile (captureProfData writes a JSON dump next to each pprof under ./data/) to verify that derivation and to size the error margin from run-to-run spread — not to supply the expected value itself.

Widen the margin where measurement is genuinely noisy (scheduler fairness, nested asyncio frames). Do not move the anchor onto a single CI sample: at ±5 an anchor of 20 accepts [15, 25] and an anchor of 19 accepts [14, 24], so a 1pp harvest tweak is arithmetically inert.

When a closed form is unavailable, document why in the profile's note field and set the anchor from a distribution (see TestFlakiness / FLAKINESS_RUNS; inspect the captured JSON dumps under ./data/).

TEST_RUN_SECS overrides the Dockerfile EXECUTION_TIME_SEC at docker run. Encode the expectation so that override still makes sense:

  • percent — share of the profile; independent of run duration.
  • value with scale_by_duration: true — a rate (per second). The analyzer multiplies by profile duration, so TEST_RUN_SECS still works (python_gil_contention is the example).
  • value with scale_by_duration: false — an absolute total, tied to the Dockerfile EXECUTION_TIME_SEC.

Example:

{
  "test_name":"some_app",
  "stacks": [
    {
      "profile-type": "cpu-time",
      "stack-content":
      [
        {
          "regular_expression":";_start;__libc_start_main.*;main;a$",
          "percent": 33,
          "error_margin": 5
        },
        {
          "regular_expression":";_start;__libc_start_main.*;main;b$",
          "percent": 66,
          "error_margin": 5
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Profile input formats

The analyzer reads both pprof and OTLP (OpenTelemetry profiles), so the same expected_profile.json can be used whichever format a profiler emits. Drop OTLP files with a .otlp (protobuf) or .otlp.json suffix; everything else is treated as pprof.

Semantic differences between formats

Formats express the same concept in different ways (for example a span link is a plain label in pprof but a LinkTable entry in OTLP). The goal is that one expectation in expected_profile.json works across formats, with each format's native encoding normalized to a shared set of label keys (see canonKey in analysis/model.go). This normalization is not complete yet, so some expectations may still need format-specific values.

Run your test

TEST_RUN_SECS=12 TEST_SCENARIOS="MyTestsName.*" go test -v -run TestScenarios

Cleanup test data (optional)

The tests results are written to the data folder. You can periodically clean that folder.

Troubleshooting

Export profiles through the agent

If you have an agent setup locally, you can run the command line with NETWORK_HOST=YES. Using network host will allow the docker instance to target the agent running locally. Example:

NETWORK_HOST=YES TEST_SCENARIOS="ddprof_allo.*"  TEST_RUN_SECS=13 go test -v -run TestScenarios

Slack notifications

You'll find a slack notification call in the test.yml that triggers when a prof correctness run fails. This expects a SLACK_WEBHOOK secret being set in the repository which must be a URL to a Slack workflow webhook. It passes the scenario and failed_run_url used for testing to the webhook, please make sure that the webhook is configured to accept this.

About

Tests for Datadog's profilers

Resources

Contributing

Stars

1 star

Watchers

8 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Used by

Contributors

Languages