ci: run Paper color scanner tests - #2550
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Chris0Jeky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Independent coordinator review at exact head bc0bb66: no CRITICAL/HIGH correctness, security, or data-loss findings. The change adds the existing scanner unit test as a separate step in the reusable job already invoked by required CI and preserves the existing audit step contract.
|
Review (agent half of the ADR-0066 gate; Codex credits exhausted, SC-9): one fresh-context reviewer confirmed the test step precedes the scanner step, the workflow name/inputs/required-check name are unchanged, YAML matches siblings, and importing the scanner under node --test does not trigger a scan. Verdict SHIP. LOW (pre-existing): the job has no setup-node step and runs on the image's Node — consider a pinned setup-node step in a follow-up. CI-control region: parked for the maintainer's review per ADR-0066 / SC-10. |
…als, review records) Answers the docs review of PR #2686: the SC-10 sentence returns to the unenumerated form (the enumeration dropped #2550 and #2610 and disagreed with the thirteenth block's count of ten); the #2675 bullet no longer says #2090 keeps only two residuals; the header names both PRs that carried a scoped verification pass (#2673, #2681) and the #2681 and #2679 bullets carry their review records; #2638 is tracked as both items.
|
Fresh-context re-review against the moved base (coordinator, 2026-09-06; SC-10 delegated, q-1 = A). VERDICT: SHIP. |
Summary
Verification
Closes #2504