Meduza: various fixes here and there

[Mayurifag]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Expanded dark-theme styling for feed containers and media blocks.
  • Added improved styling for related content lists, links, headers, and controls.

• Bug Fixes

  • Replaced outdated related-content styling to ensure these elements display correctly in dark mode.

• Chores

  • Updated the UserStyle version to 1.0.6.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 1dfad796-62af-4bff-bffa-b5bea96b3e0a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b04af1 and c1e3629.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Meduza/Meduza-Dark.user.css

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The UserStyle version changed to 1.0.6. Dark-theme coverage now includes feed and media surfaces. Related content uses updated selectors, hover colors, and muted control text.

Changes

Meduza dark-theme styling

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Theme selector and metadata updates Meduza/Meduza-Dark.user.css	The version changed from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6. Background styling now covers feed containers and media blocks. Related-list and related-material selectors replace the obsolete RelatedBlock selector and define link hover, header, and media-control colors.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to c1e36

This is a small, localized stylesheet change with no actionable merge-blocking risk identified; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

Poem

The dark styles gather near,
Feed and media lose their glare.
Related links glow when hovered,
Muted controls stand uncovered.
Version one point six now sings,
A shaded coat for Meduza’s wings.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title refers generally to fixes in the Meduza user style, but “various fixes here and there” does not identify the specific dark-theme and selector changes.	Replace the title with a concise description of the main change, such as “Meduza: expand dark-theme styling and update related selectors”.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}