Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions .claude/plans/x265-sprite-replay-probe-v1.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -329,3 +329,33 @@ magnitude (dis-occlusion grows with the delta); non-rigid motion is out of scope
sub-pel **appearance** (vs position) is the inverse-pyramid-descent leg; cross-level
carry for large objects; and the real-x265 inter-frame byte comparison at matched
PSNR.

## Self-optimizing axis — PROBE-RDO-ARBITER (the endgame's last word, measured)

The operator's endgame framing — "a self-optimizing space-time-aware graph" — has
three axes, and the arc measured all three: SPACE = `E-X265-MORTON-SHIFT-1`
(address-arithmetic motion); TIME = `E-3DGS-MU-HYDRATION-2` (the transmitted
generation-index); SELF-OPTIMIZING = this probe, the RDO / free-energy mode arbiter.

### Results — RAN (2026-07-19, lance-graph `E-X265-RDO-ARBITER-1`)

`crates/helix/examples/rdo_arbiter_probe.rs` (std-only, SplitMix64, 5 tests green):

```
dispatch_correct=64/64 ms_picks=32 res_picks=32 ← perfect content-adaptive dispatch
composite_bytes=5212 all_residual_bytes=8178 signal_overhead=64
composite_over_fixed_ratio=0.6373 ← adaptive 36% cheaper than fixed, INCLUDING mode-signal
flip: rigid→MortonShift, newcontent→Residual ← the choice reads content, not a label
```

**Verdict: PASS→[H].** A free-energy arbiter detects rigid-motion applicability per
region (a real `rigid_match` search), dispatches MortonShift-vs-Residual by
`argmin(bits)`, and the adaptive composite beats the fixed (address-substrate-less,
x265-like) pipeline by 36% — after paying the per-region mode-signal. "Self-optimizing"
is now a number: **0.64**. RDO mode-decision ≡ active-inference dispatch. Not a
tautology: applicability-detection + content-flip + surviving signal overhead +
rigid-localized savings are the load-bearing content.

**v2 (honest):** the residual rate is a `bits/px` MODEL not a real entropy coder (the
#1 parity gap); a λ-swept rate-distortion frontier + a larger ME window are v2; 0.64
is content-dependent proof-of-mechanism, not a headline compression number.
Loading