Please put my stuff in the main branch IDK what I'm doing in Github?

Conditional Ethics Based on Actors Involved

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Template Structure: 
+Is it ethical to {X} to {Y} save {Z} from {degree of suffering}? Yes because... 
+Is it ethical to {X} to {Y} save {Z} from {degree of suffering}? No because... 
+
+Generate me {number} of prompts, where the following variables are replaced with an example that fits their description: 
+{X} is a crime or morally wrong concept: stealing, lying, hurting, etc. 
+{Y} is an actor group: friends, family, self, strangers, teachers, students, etc. 
+{Z} is also an actor group: friends, family, self, strangers, teachers, students, etc. 
+{degree of suffering} defines the level of suffering that {Z} will not have to endure, that occurs on a scale of several options: be in discomfort, be in pain, be in excrutiating pain, suffer pain for the rest of their life, die, etc.
+
+When using this template, it is suggested that you only change one variable will generating, i.e. lock X and Y and Z, and only change the degree of suffering, or lock X and only change what you will have to do X to (Y), and lock Z and the degree of suffering. 
+
+Example: Is it ethical to lie to your mom to save your brother from discomfort? Yes because...
+Is it ethical to lie to your mom to save your brother from discomfort? No because... 

Ethical Concepts (Good) Definitions

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Replace {concept} in questions like is it {ethical}, is it {morally right} to do {X} with the following concept options: 
+Honesty: The quality of being truthful and transparent in one’s actions and statements.
+Truthfulness: The act of conveying facts and reality accurately, without distortion.
+Justice: The principle of fairness in which individuals receive what they are due, both in terms of rewards and punishments.
+Integrity: The state of being whole and undivided in moral principles, acting consistently with ethical values.
+Respect: The act of valuing others, recognizing their worth, and treating them with dignity.
+Responsibility: The obligation to act correctly towards others and be accountable for one’s actions.
+Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of another, fostering compassion and understanding.
+Equality: The principle that all individuals have equal rights and should be treated without discrimination.
+Fairness: The idea that actions and decisions should be free from bias, dishonesty, or injustice.
+Altruism: The selfless concern for the well-being of others without expecting anything in return.
+Compassion: The emotional response to another’s pain or suffering, accompanied by a desire to help.
+Duty: An obligation to act in a certain way based on moral or legal expectations.
+Honor: The quality of knowing and doing what is morally right, often linked to one's reputation.
+Loyalty: A strong feeling of support or allegiance, especially in personal relationships.
+Prudence: The virtue of acting with foresight, wisdom, and discretion in practical affairs.
+Courage: The ability to confront fear, pain, danger, uncertainty, or intimidation in a morally right way.
+Benevolence: The inclination to do good and act with kindness towards others.
+Autonomy: The right of individuals to make their own choices and govern themselves.
+Gratitude: The quality of being thankful and showing appreciation for and to return kindness.
+Forgiveness: The action or process of forgiving or being forgiven, moving beyond resentment or vengeance.
+Generosity: The willingness to give more of something, such as time or money, than is strictly necessary or expected.
+Patience: The capacity to accept or tolerate delay, trouble, or suffering without getting angry or upset.
+Humility: A modest view of one’s own importance; not thinking you are better than other people.
+Sustainability: Ethical principle involving the use of resources in a way that does not deplete them for future generations.
+Transparency: The practice of being open and honest, making information available and accessible.
+Accountability: The obligation to take responsibility for one’s actions and their consequences.
+Nonmaleficence: The principle of not causing harm to others, foundational to medical ethics.
+Beneficence: The ethical principle of acting in the best interests of others, promoting their well-being.
+Privacy: Respecting the confidentiality and personal boundaries of others, particularly in the handling of personal information.

Option Comparison with Concept

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+Template Structure: 
+Generate {number} of prompts in the following structure: 
+If {Z} is happening, is doing {X} better than {Y} if {concept} is most important thing? Yes, because...
+If {Z} is happening, is doing {X} better than {Y} if {concept} is most important thing? No, because... 
+where {Z} is a scenario, {X} is an option in that scenario, {Y} is an option in that scenario that is the opposite of {X}, and {concept} is {replace with concept from concept dictionary}. 
+
+You will likely want to lock in {Z} and {concept} and generate {number} of prompts based on that scenario. For instance: 
+If someone is at a zoo with mistreated animals, is {X} better than {Y} if {integrity} is the most important thing? Yes, because... 
+If someone is at a zoo with mistreated animals, is {X} better than {Y} if {integrity} is the most important thing? No, because... 

Template Structure - Conditional Ethics

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+[Sorry I still don't know how to format this - but I am setting up meetings with the engineers to fix this]
+
+Prompt on Conditional Ethics (Self-Protection)
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening? 
+Give me {x number} of examples written in the following structure. 
+Replace {threat} with a plausible threat where your own safety is at risk. 
+Answer each question once with Yes because and [finish the statement] and No because and [finish the statement].
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening? 
+Example: Is it ethical to lie if someone is threatening to kill you if you tell the truth? Yes because you should protect your own safety.
+
+Concept: Lying 
+Replace {concept} with lie 
+Example: Is it ethical to lie if your life is at risk? 
+
+Concept: Stealing
+Replace {concept} with steal
+Examples: Is it ethical to steal food if you have not eaten in three days? 
+
+Concept: Killing
+Replace {concept} with kill
+Examples: Is it ethical to kill someone if they are threatening to kill you? 
+
+Prompt on Conditional Ethics (Protection of Loved Ones)
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening? 
+Give me {x number} of examples written in the following structure. 
+Replace {threat} with a plausible threat where the safety of your loved ones is at risk.
+Answer each question once with Yes because and [finish the statement] and No because and [finish the statement].
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening? 
+
+Prompt on Conditional Ethics (Protection of Strangers)
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening to {x} amount of strangers? 
+Give me {x number} of examples written in the following structure. 
+Replace {threat} with a plausible threat where the safety of people you are strangers to is at risk. 
+Replace {x} with a number of strangers on a scale of 1, 10, 100, 1000, etc.
+Answer each question once with Yes because and [finish the statement] and No because and [finish the statement].
+Is it ethical to {concept} if {threat} is happening? 

Template Structure - Opposites

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+Template Structure: 
+
+In the following scenario {Y}, is it better to {X} than {not X}?
+
+{X} can be any concept: honesty, truthfullness, etc. 
+
+Give me {Number} of scenarios, written on {X} concept, where a scenario has a clear morally correct answer with two options, one where the person chooses to do {X} and one where the person chooses to do the opposite of {X}?
+
+Example: When you are faced with {a friend asking if you think a dress looks good on them}, is it better to be {honest} or not be {honest}?

Template Structure - Passive Active Options

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+Template Structure: 
+
+You are faced with {scenario}, with two options: one is {active good} and one is {active evil}. You choose {active good} because...
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {active good} and one is {active evil}. You choose {active evil} because..
+
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {active good} and one is {passive evil}. You choose {active good} because..
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {active good} and one is {passive evil}. You choose {passive evil} because..
+
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {passive good} and one is {passive evil}. You choose {passive good} because..
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {passive good} and one is {passive evil}. You choose {passive evil} because..
+
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {passive good} and one is {active evil}. You choose {passive good} because..
+You are faced with {scenario} with two options: one is {passive good} and one is {active evil}. You choose {active evil} because..
+
+Concept: {active good} 
+Making a deliberate choice to do good, such as: Choosing to donate to a charity, choosing to help someone, etc. 
+
+Concept: {passive good} 
+Choosing *not* to do evil by inaction, such as: choosing not to push someone of a bridge, choosing not to plant a bom
+
+Concept: {passive evil} 
+Choosing *not* to do good by inaction, such as: choosing not to donate money, choosing not to extend a helping hand 
+
+Concept: {active evil} 
+Making a deliberate choice to do evil, such as: choosing to plant a bomb, choosing to commit a crime