You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Paper location:programs/gaussian-gravitational-decoherence/index.tex, §"Time-independence in the Newtonian limit" and the preceding noise-kernel derivation — eq:N0000 (line ~232, the general noise kernel N_{0000}(x,x') = (c^4/4)Δρ(x)Δρ(x')) and eq:N0000_static (line ~265, its time-independent/static specialization for a stationary superposition). The surrounding text (lines ~262–268) states that the static character of eq:N0000_static "is the key structural feature that distinguishes the Einstein–Langevin noise from the white noise postulated by Diósi" — this is the claim GGD-3 exists to independently harden or challenge.
Context.informs-issue#107 (arXiv:2606.04099, Takeda–Tomizuka–Tanaka, "Gravitationally Induced Quantum Decoherence of Macroscopic Objects") derives a closed-time-path influence functional for gravitational decoherence of a superposed massive object, starting from linearized gravity coupled to an environmental quantum field, with the noise source built by dressing the environmental stress-energy correlator with graviton propagators. Per the abstract (per #107, not yet verified against the primary source — verification is part of this issue's precondition, not a shortcut to skip), the resulting decoherence contribution accumulates logarithmically over distance and is subdominant to collisional decoherence under realistic conditions. This is a structurally different-looking result (log accumulation vs. GGD's static, factorized Δρ(x)Δρ(x') kernel) computed via a different channel (environment-mediated graviton dressing vs. GGD's direct acoustic-mode / rigid-body Newtonian construction), so the OBJECTIVES done-condition explicitly makes establishing comparability part of the milestone, not an assumed given.
Note: PR #173 (merged, first live explorer cycle) investigated a different cross-program question — whether GGD's stationary-noise approximation sits inside FPE's M3 obstruction — and is not a substitute for this milestone; it did not touch arXiv:2606.04099 or #107 at all. GGD-3 remains fully open.
Deliverable (mirrors the milestone's done-condition):
Establish comparability. Before any agreement/disagreement claim can be signal, state explicitly what must match between the two constructions for a meaningful comparison: the physical setup (Newtonian-limit, non-relativistic rigid-body superposition — matching GGD's own Assumption regime), the regime (stationary/static superposition, matching eq:N0000_static's own stated preconditions — wavepacket spreading negligible on the decoherence timescale), and which piece of arXiv:2606.04099's construction is the analogue of GGD's Δρ(x)Δρ(x') noise kernel (as opposed to its logarithmic-distance far-field/environmental-field-loop contribution, which may not be the comparable object at all).
Then, and only then: either (a) show the independent construction reproduces the static, factorized kernel structure of eq:N0000_static under matched Newtonian/stationary assumptions — hardening Result 2 (the Gaussian $t^2$ profile) beyond the paper's own built-in Gaussian-noise Assumption 1; or (b) show it disagrees under matched assumptions — a demotion signal for Result 2, to be filed as such (an honest negative result is a complete, valid deliverable per this program's demotion-as-normal-maintenance convention).
Acceptance criteria:
Rigor label: Sketch level acceptable per the milestone; do not claim Rigorous for a comparison built on an unverified secondary summary.
Self-checks: dimensional consistency between the imported kernel object and eq:N0000_static (both must reduce to the same units for a two-point stress-energy correlator); limiting cases — check whether arXiv:2606.04099's result reduces to something comparable to eq:N0000_static in the appropriate Newtonian/stationary/non-relativistic limit, or state precisely why no such limit exists if comparability fails at step 2; consistency — the comparison must not disturb any already-merged §5 discriminant number (GGD-2, PR GGD-2: recompute discrimination metrics at corrected τ_DP and extend §5 to dDP #105) or GGD-4's per-realization/ensemble result (PR GGD-4: resolve Remark 2 ensemble-dephasing caveat (per-realization coherence; §5 observable re-scoped) #151) unless the comparison result is a demotion signal, in which case say so explicitly and note the affected downstream milestones.
Milestone: GGD-3 (
programs/gaussian-gravitational-decoherence/OBJECTIVES.md) — Independent noise-kernel cross-check.Paper location:
programs/gaussian-gravitational-decoherence/index.tex, §"Time-independence in the Newtonian limit" and the preceding noise-kernel derivation —eq:N0000(line ~232, the general noise kernelN_{0000}(x,x') = (c^4/4)Δρ(x)Δρ(x')) andeq:N0000_static(line ~265, its time-independent/static specialization for a stationary superposition). The surrounding text (lines ~262–268) states that the static character ofeq:N0000_static"is the key structural feature that distinguishes the Einstein–Langevin noise from the white noise postulated by Diósi" — this is the claim GGD-3 exists to independently harden or challenge.Context.
informs-issue#107 (arXiv:2606.04099, Takeda–Tomizuka–Tanaka, "Gravitationally Induced Quantum Decoherence of Macroscopic Objects") derives a closed-time-path influence functional for gravitational decoherence of a superposed massive object, starting from linearized gravity coupled to an environmental quantum field, with the noise source built by dressing the environmental stress-energy correlator with graviton propagators. Per the abstract (per #107, not yet verified against the primary source — verification is part of this issue's precondition, not a shortcut to skip), the resulting decoherence contribution accumulates logarithmically over distance and is subdominant to collisional decoherence under realistic conditions. This is a structurally different-looking result (log accumulation vs. GGD's static, factorizedΔρ(x)Δρ(x')kernel) computed via a different channel (environment-mediated graviton dressing vs. GGD's direct acoustic-mode / rigid-body Newtonian construction), so the OBJECTIVES done-condition explicitly makes establishing comparability part of the milestone, not an assumed given.Note: PR #173 (merged, first live
explorercycle) investigated a different cross-program question — whether GGD's stationary-noise approximation sits inside FPE's M3 obstruction — and is not a substitute for this milestone; it did not touch arXiv:2606.04099 or #107 at all. GGD-3 remains fully open.Deliverable (mirrors the milestone's done-condition):
eq:N0000_static's own stated preconditions — wavepacket spreading negligible on the decoherence timescale), and which piece of arXiv:2606.04099's construction is the analogue of GGD'sΔρ(x)Δρ(x')noise kernel (as opposed to its logarithmic-distance far-field/environmental-field-loop contribution, which may not be the comparable object at all).eq:N0000_staticunder matched Newtonian/stationary assumptions — hardening Result 2 (the GaussianAcceptance criteria:
eq:N0000_static(both must reduce to the same units for a two-point stress-energy correlator); limiting cases — check whether arXiv:2606.04099's result reduces to something comparable toeq:N0000_staticin the appropriate Newtonian/stationary/non-relativistic limit, or state precisely why no such limit exists if comparability fails at step 2; consistency — the comparison must not disturb any already-merged §5 discriminant number (GGD-2, PR GGD-2: recompute discrimination metrics at corrected τ_DP and extend §5 to dDP #105) or GGD-4's per-realization/ensemble result (PR GGD-4: resolve Remark 2 ensemble-dephasing caveat (per-realization coherence; §5 observable re-scoped) #151) unless the comparison result is a demotion signal, in which case say so explicitly and note the affected downstream milestones.\begin{thebibliography}at paper-grade without that verification.Declared relations:
needs-human, PR GGD-1: Acoustic-gravitational crossover threshold — Conjecture 1 restricted (no accessible platform) #141) — no direct dependency; noted per the milestone's own cross-reference.informs-issue[informs-issue] arXiv:2606.04099 — Gravitationally induced decoherence noise kernel from linearized gravity (GGD-2, GGD-1) #107 (its purpose — surfacing the pointer for action — is fulfilled once this milestone issue exists to act on it).routine: scout · model: claude-sonnet-5