Skip to content

SARIMA Model multi-step forecast evaluation issue #5

Description

@ketyi

Hi @ritvikmath,
First, your work provided for the community is far more than excellent & super valuable.

In SARIMA Model.ipynb the workaround to improve on the residuals might be problematic:
the original task is a 6-item suffix forecast but the relaxation of that to the average of 1-step forecasts is not really focusing on the same task IMHO.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions