Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
For structural imaging/brain extraction:
|
0 replies
|
For determining the grade of a dataset/benchmark, which would help with interpretability, we could create an exhaustive list of dimensions and a rubric for how to determine the standard based on which subset of them are checked |
0 replies
|
Hey Audrey, thought you might be a good person to be a part of this conversation. @hough129 |
0 replies
|
Here is a first pass at a list or properties we want to cover in the dataset: Developmental Status:
Species:
- State/Task
- Contrast agents
Clinical Population:
Evaluation Standard:
Data quality:
- Motion
- Artifacts
Modality:
- Acquisition protocol type:
- Scanner
- Magnet strength
- Data quantity
Ancillary data availability:It's possible this list could be enhanced with other BIDS-esque metadata, too... |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
let's try to determine the different dimensions that we should have.
@oesteban @mgxd
All reactions