Skip to content

DOCS: Clearly document unsupported Iceberg Features #1109

Description

@sungwy

Feature Request / Improvement

Some features that users expect from an Iceberg Client (like #1084) are not yet implemented in PyIceberg, leading to much wasted time from our users.

It will be helpful to clearly document what features are not yet supported on Iceberg to minimize frustration and wasted effort from our community.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions