Output for 'ne'

[diyclassics]

See gist here: https://gist.github.com/diyclassics/e82e4ebfe0ab8b7c899f50ff4b03d0eb

I noticed that 'nes' appears as a lemma for the input 'ne'. I think that this is an error based on the following observations from the data files:

• 'nes' appears in the extended data as 'nes|cometes|||ae, m.|1' (https://github.com/PonteIneptique/collatinus-python/blob/master/pycollatinus/data/lem_ext.la; also at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/biblissima/collatinus/master/bin/data/lem_ext.la)
• In this file (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/biblissima/collatinus/master/bin/data/lem_ext.en), it is glossed as "nes:one who dances on a thin cord, a, cord-dancer"
• This is the same gloss as the one below for "neurobates:one who dances on a thin cord, a cord-dancer"; this word appears in several lexicons in a truncated form, cf. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=neurobata&la=la#lexicon, perhaps explaining the introduction of this form.

Does this sound plausible?

[PonteIneptique]

Given the fact it does not appear here : https://outils.biblissima.fr/fr/collatinus-web/ it could be an issue on my end.

[PonteIneptique]

But you're right, it seems like a duplicate. Could you PR the original data from Collatinus rather than here ? When it's tied to the data, I believe it's a better choice :)

[PonteIneptique]

Are you fine with this @diyclassics ? :)

[diyclassics]

@PonteIneptique To clarify—are you asking that I remove that line from the data file in the original Collatinus data files (i.e. the ones referred to above under the second bullet point 'In this file...') and make a PR there? And when that is accepted (assuming it is accepted), that I should make a similar PR here?

[PonteIneptique]

You do not need to PR here, I'll just suscribe to your PR there and use the update data script :)
I assume it will, they are generaly happy to deal with this.

[PonteIneptique]

I did it as I might have something similar to do in the next few days on another issue

biblissima/collatinus#61