Skip to content

Naming Convention #600

Description

Type of issue

Typo

Description

The convention suggests that private instance fields should start with an underscore, followed by camel casing for the rest of the name, such as _name instead of name. This helps improve code readability and maintainability.

While this example is perfectly functional, I just want to confirm: Is this an intentional exception to the standard naming convention rule

[Enter feedback here]

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/communitytoolkit/mvvm/generators/observableproperty?source=docs

Content source URL

https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/CommunityToolkit/blob/main/docs/mvvm/generators/ObservableProperty.md

Document Version Independent Id

baa399f1-fe73-add4-df84-b99a29fb4083

Platform Id

ad393ed8-f5e6-db3a-482a-0d8a458e1b40

Article author

Sergio Pedri (@Sergio0694)

Metadata

  • ID: baa399f1-fe73-add4-df84-b99a29fb4083
  • PlatformId: ad393ed8-f5e6-db3a-482a-0d8a458e1b40
  • Service: dotnet-communitytoolkit
  • Sub-service: mvvm-toolkit

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions